[ad_1]
“These rights have been established to allow information businesses and publishers to be remunerated by digital platforms which retain many of the financial worth generated by the distribution of stories content material,” the company stated in its assertion.
In a tweet on Wednesday, Musk known as the lawsuit “weird.”
“They need us to pay *them* for site visitors to their web site the place they make promoting income and we don’t!?” he wrote on X, which he bought in October.
Regulatory proposals to drive social media firms to pay publishers for content material featured on their platforms have been met with related pushback. In June, Meta stated it could block Canadians from sharing information on Fb and Instagram in response to a brand new Canadian regulation that requires social media firms to pay home publishers for content material.
In Could, Meta threatened to dam California customers from sharing information on its platforms, as state legislators there have been weighing laws requiring social media firms to pay information retailers for his or her content material.
Australia handed an identical regulation in 2021, requiring the businesses to strike offers with Australian information retailers for the content material posted to their platforms — a transfer that prompted completely different responses from Meta and Google. The businesses now strike offers with Australian information retailers for content material posted to their platforms.
[ad_2]
Source_link