[ad_1]
Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Legislation, which is now two years previous, has printed over fifty articles, together with by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU, forthcoming inside per week or so), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and plenty of others—each outstanding figures within the subject and rising younger students (together with ones who did not have a tenure-track tutorial appointment).
I count on that many authors are planning to submit articles on free speech to the same old regulation evaluations when the submission cycle restarts in August. However when you submit completely to us earlier than that, we will provide you with a solution inside 14 days (our assure, which we’ve got to this point by no means damaged); after which if you would like to have it printed rapidly, we will publish it in inside a number of weeks, if it is sufficiently clear and cite-checked by your analysis assistant. (We will even have it cite-checked for you by certainly one of our pupil staffers, however that takes a bit longer.) This implies your article may be printed by us, if it is accepted, nearly a 12 months (or extra) earlier than it might be printed by the regulation journals.
After all, additionally please go this alongside to mates or colleagues who you assume is likely to be . Notice that the submissions do not compete for a restricted variety of slots in a problem or quantity; we’ll publish articles that fulfill our high quality requirements each time we get them.
All submissions have to be unique to us, however, once more, you will have a solution inside 14 days, so you’ll submit elsewhere if we are saying no. Please submit an anonymized draft, along with at https://freespeechlaw.scholasticahq.com/. A number of pointers:
- As a substitute of a canopy letter, please submit at most one web page (and ideally only a paragraph or two) explaining how your article is novel. If there’s a explicit method of displaying that (e.g., it is the primary article to debate how case X and doctrine Y work together), please tell us.
- Please submit articles single-spaced, in a proportionally spaced font.
- Please make it possible for the Introduction rapidly and clearly explains the primary claims you’re making.
- Please keep away from prolonged background sections reciting acquainted Supreme Courtroom precedents or different well-known issues. We desire articles that get proper right down to the novel materials (if vital, rapidly explaining the required authorized rules as they go).
- Every article must be as brief as potential, and so long as vital.
- Like everybody else, we like easy, clear, partaking writing.
- We’re open to student-written work, and we consider it beneath the identical requirements relevant to work written by others.
We publish:
- Articles that say one thing we do not already know.
- Articles with all kinds of approaches: doctrinal, theoretical, historic, empirical, or in any other case.
- Articles coping with speech, press, meeting, petition, or expression extra broadly.
- Usually not articles purely targeted on the Free Train Clause or Institution Clause, besides if additionally they considerably talk about non secular speech.
- Articles concerning the First Modification, state constitutional free speech provisions, federal and state statutes, common-law guidelines, and laws defending or proscribing speech, or non-public organizations’ speech laws.
- Articles about U.S. regulation, international regulation, comparative regulation, or worldwide regulation.
- Each massive, bold work and narrower materials.
- Articles which can be helpful to the academy, to the bench, or to the bar (or if potential, to all three).
- Articles arguing for broader speech safety, narrower speech safety, or anything.
[ad_2]
Source_link