[ad_1]
Might Kamala Harris resolve a dispute over competing electoral vote slates within the 2024 presidential election, maybe selecting the slate supporting her personal re-election as vice chairman? In a latest legislation assessment article within the Case Western Reserve Regulation Evaluation, Professor John Yoo and Robert Delahunty argued that the vice chairman has a small, however important, function in resolving such disputes (although not as nice a task as Donald Trump or John Eastman claimed). Their article, whereas aligning with claims that had been made by different teachers prior to now, was fairly controversial.
Notre Dame legislation professor Derek Muller responds to Yoo and Delahunty within the newest challenge of the Case Western Reserve Regulation Evaluation, explaining why their idea is unsuitable. Even when there had been competing slates of electors from particular person states, the Vice President lacks the authority to resolve such disputes.
Right here is how the article begins:
On January 6, 2021, the President of the Senate—Vice President Mike Pence—dutifully opened the electoral votes from the 2020 presidential election and skim aloud the totals. He acted in line with the path of the Electoral Depend Act of 1887, in line with the congressional joint decision accepted three days earlier, and in line with greater than two centuries of congressional observe. Not everybody was satisfied that the Structure and legal guidelines of the USA obligated Pence to behave on this means—most notably, President Donald Trump, who had simply misplaced the election and sought a option to flip defeat into victory.
On this, Professors Robert Delahunty and John Yoo agree with Pence. Of their latest article right here within the Case Western Reserve Regulation Evaluation on the subject of the function of the Vice President in counting electoral votes, they conclude, “Pence was obliged to depend the votes as submitted by the states.” However they attain a unique conclusion on who holds the authorized energy to depend electoral votes and resolve disputes. They conclude, “Our idea results in the conclusion that the most effective studying of the constitutional textual content, construction, and historical past assigns that function to the Vice President, not Congress or the judiciary.” In distinction, “Congress has no substantive function within the course of.”
Congress has regularly rejected this view for greater than 200 years, and maybe it’s a cause Pence noticed no such room for debate. Professors Delahunty and Yoo helpfully study the historical past surrounding disputes over counting electoral votes and in locations make acceptable situations on the modesty of their claims. However this Essay explains why Congress, and never the President of the Senate, holds the facility to depend electoral votes and to resolve disputes over them.
Some particulars assist body the center of the controversy. There are doubtlessly three totally different obligations to think about when the Home and the Senate be a part of collectively earlier than the President of the Senate for the counting of electoral votes. First, who presides over the joint session the place counting takes place, and what’s the function of that presiding officer? Second, who counts the electoral votes? Third, who resolves disputes about these electoral votes?
This Essay solutions these questions. First, the presiding officer within the joint session is the President of the Senate, and he or she acts as another presiding officer of a legislature. She initiates actions pursuant to precedent, parliamentary procedures, and the desires of the chamber. And meaning the chamber—right here, the joint session—can constrain the President of the Senate as presiding officer. Congress did precisely that when it selected to additional constrain the distraction of the President of the Senate within the Electoral Depend Reform Act of 2022. Second, Congress counts electoral votes. The proof within the textual content and construction of the Structure and congressional observe earlier than the ratification of the Twelfth Modification helps this interpretation. Third, the facility to resolve disputes runs with the facility to depend. And meaning Congress additionally has the facility to resolve disputes about presidential electors.
Separating these obligations is essential as a result of it may be too simple to conflate a few of these actions, which in flip elides over the distinctions in obligations. When the presiding officer acts, she does so to not depend votes, however to preside over the joint session and assist it proceed in response to the foundations and precedents set by Congress. The actions she takes might resemble the substantive act of counting. However shut scrutiny of the document displays that the President of the Senate doesn’t depend, and has by no means counted, votes. That’s as a result of the facility to depend resides in Congress, the place the Twelfth Modification lodges that energy.
The complete article is right here.
[ad_2]
Source_link