[ad_1]
The US, the UK, and the European Union voted towards a UN decision condemning Quran burnings and calling on states to ban them.
In Geneva, the UN Human Rights Council handed a decision sponsored by Pakistan this morning, however a number of Western international locations objected.
It’s referred to within the decision as “It’s offensive, disrespectful, and clearly a manifestation of spiritual hatred to deliberately burn the Holy Quran or every other holy e-book with the intent of inciting hatred, hostility, or discrimination, and affirm that in accordance with worldwide human rights regulation, this act shall be prohibited by regulation.”
On the 53rd common session of the UN Human Rights Council, 28 international locations voted in favor, 12 voted towards, and 7 abstained.
![UK, EU and US Vote Against Ban On Quran Burning, UN Resolution 6 Countries that voted to ban Quran burnings Yes means they want Quran burnings to be banned. No means the countries doesnt want to put ban on Quran burnings 1](https://theislamicinformation.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Countries-that-voted-to-ban-Quran-burnings-Yes-means-they-want-Quran-burnings-to-be-banned.-No-means-the-countries-doesnt-want-to-put-ban-on-Quran-burnings-1-1024x1024.jpeg)
The next international locations voted in favor of the decision:
- Algeria
- Argentina
- Bangladesh
- Bolivia
- Cameroon
- China
- Ivory Coast
- Cuba
- Eritrea
- Gabon
- Gambia
- India
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
- Malawi
- Malaysia
- Maldives
- Morocco
- Pakistan
- Qatar
- Senegal
- Somalia
- South Africa
- Sudan
- Ukraine
- United Arab Emirates
- Uzbekistan
- Vietnam
The next international locations voted towards the decision:
- Belgium
- Costa Rica
- Czech Republic
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Montenegro
- Romania
- UK
- U.S.
Human rights and freedom of expression are at odds with the decision, in accordance with america and the European Union.
“From expertise, we all know that banning such expression often solely amplifies it additional by drawing much more consideration to it and sometimes serves as a catalyst for additional hatred,”
Rashad Hussain, U.S. ambassador at massive for worldwide spiritual freedom, expressed opposition to so-called “blasphemy” legal guidelines.
The U.S. ambassador to the council, Michele Taylor, expressed robust condemnation of the acts that led to immediately’s dialogue, together with the desecration of the Holy Quran on June 28 — referring to an incident in Sweden final month that sparked protests world wide.
Aspiring to strike a “prudent stability” between the precise to free speech and “particular duties and tasks,” Ambassador Khalil Hashmi of Pakistan insisted after the vote.
Some members of the viewers oppose the desecration of any spiritual e-book or the Holy Quran attributable to their unwillingness to sentence that act,” Hashmi mentioned. “They lacked the political, authorized, and ethical braveness to sentence this act, which was the minimal they might have completed.”
Volker Turk, the UN Excessive Commissioner for Human Rights, mentioned yesterday: “This pressing debate has been prompted by current incidents of burning of the Quran, which is the core of religion for a couple of billion folks.” It appeared that these and different incidents have been manufactured to precise contempt and provoke anger, drive wedges between folks, and provoke, turning variations of perspective into hatred and violence.”
The limitation of speech or expression ought to stay an exception, he mentioned, since legal guidelines that limit speech are sometimes misused by these in energy, together with to stifle debate on vital points. Alternatively, in sure circumstances, a speech may represent an incitement to violence or discrimination on the a part of others.
Incitement to violence, discrimination, and hostility must be prohibited in each state, he mentioned.
[ad_2]
Source_link