[ad_1]
There are dozens of governmental entities with the authority to control how residents of the Los Angeles metro space can use their land: what house owners can construct, what they cannot construct, parking minimums, property setbacks, and different rules that usually apply to new housing.
This jigsaw puzzle of native governments inside a single metropolitan space may cause confusion for residents. “Housing and labor markets work at a metropolitan degree,” says M. Nolan Grey, analysis director for California YIMBY and creator of Arbitrary Strains, a e-book about how zoning codes hurt American cities. “Whenever you’re deciding the place to dwell or work, you do not cease your search at municipal boundaries—you go searching inside an hour or so commute.”
The patchwork method can worsen land use guidelines, Grey warns, as a result of every metropolis unofficially competes by passing more and more strict rules to please incumbent property house owners. Residents of, say, Santa Clarita or Pasadena get to guard their yard views, the “character” of an previous neighborhood, or a street with sparse visitors, whereas individuals who may gain advantage from new housing inventory are exiled to unincorporated components of the Los Angeles metro space, the place there are fewer stakeholders to lift a ruckus.
Click on to broaden:
![A map showing municipal governments in the Los Angeles area](https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/q60/uploads/2023/08/la-map-local-gov-1024x636.png)
From the October 2023 problem of Motive Journal.
[ad_2]
Source_link